|
AHMA-NCNH
TOUCHSTONE / Newsletters
|
Novemerber, 2002 Newsletters
Copyright
2002 Ansel Publications. All rights reserved.
IG
Tackles Overpayments
In an effort to reduce the estimated $1.7 billion in rental assistance
overpayments, HUD's Inspector General is requesting more on-site
monitoring in affordable housing properties. Closer
monitoring of approximately 4 million households nationwide should
also unearth $600 million in underpayments to deserving
families, according to a report from the IG's office to Congress. The
report speculated that it would take another two years of departmental
efforts to implement monitoring and several more years after that to
determine the effects on residents and HUD.
The report
requests onsite reviews of rental assistance on Section 8 properties,
information to housing authorities on determining assistance and
guidance on Section vouchers. HUD's success in financial management is
weakened by a lack of integration between financial systems, including
a database between the HUD general ledger and the FHA, according to
the report. HUD initiatives to improve financial management have been
hampered by budget problems, goal changes and delays in
scheduling.
House
Bill Will Undercut Vouchers
Affordable housing groups are quickly lobbying Congress on the dangers
of changing the way renewal vouchers are calculated since the HUD
appropriations bill passed out of a House committee. The
House 2003 appropriations bill will adversely change the way renewal
vouchers are calculated and cause funding problem for public housing
agencies, according to statements from members of several affordable
housing groups. After
the bill passed the House committee, several housing groups including
the Council of Large Public Housing Agencies, the National Leased
Housing
Association, and the Public Housing Authorities Directors
Association
began to survey their members for information to determine if the bill
will cause inadequate funding situations for PHAs. At
a time when operating costs are increasing, the House bill calls for
the use of older renewal figures to determine the number of units
leased, usually based on numbers that are at least two years old and
not accounting for inflation. These older figures will cause problems
with PHAs if operating costs increase. Although the bill creates a
central reserve fund, affordable housing officials claim the fund will
not cover increased expenses. Housing
officials are speculating that the House bill, if passed as is and is
incorporated into the final bill, will cause PHAs with funding
problems to decide whether to increase rents or recall vouchers.
Commission
On Elderly Issues Disagrees On Needs
A bipartisan
commission on elderly issues has
been unable to agree on the proposed needs of senior citizens in the
21st century in a report released last summer. The
Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility Needs for Seniors
in
the 21st Century issued majority and minority reports in "A Quiet
Crisis in America." Congress originally appointed the commission
to study the needs for elderly housing and health facilities and to
make policy recommendations that would improve housing and supportive
services available to seniors. The
first difference is that the majority report does not include
suggestions for program funding while the minority report lists
programs which should be more fully funded and emphasized programs for
low-income elderly with the greatest need, such as $200 million for
preservation of existing assisted housing and the replacement of a new
unit for every assisted unit lost. The
majority report mentioned concerns about available data and it's
reliability, but went on to provide five basic recommendations:
existing housing stock, rental and single ownership, should be
preserved for aging in place;
shelter and supportive services should be linked to promote aging
in
place; expansion of successful housing production, rental assistance;
supportive
housing programs, and home-and community-based services;
reformation of existing federal financing programs through the
Government Sponsored Enterprises and FHA to provide flexibility,
increased production and coverage of health care and services in
housing; research into new housing and service programs, models and
demonstrations.
Aging
in place for homeowners was a concern in the majority report, while
the minority emphasized government-assisted rental housing and cited
the disparity of government support for homeownership compared to
housing assistance for the poorest seniors. The
minority report also recommended that Congress provide for housing
production, preservation and increasing assisted and supportive
housing for seniors by 60,000 units per year through HUD and
Department of Health and Human Services programs. Aging in place
support systems such as expanding Medicare to include long-term care
and prescription drugs
and Medicaid eligibility based on area median income were also
minority suggestions. Information
on the commission's finding is available online at
www.seniorscommission.gov
Watch
List Properties Financially Unstable
A
study of 211 mark-to-market properties on HUD's "watch list"
has found that 62 percent have a potential for financial risk and
almost half do not have the funds to cover mortgage payments.
Senators
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD), Jack Reed (D-RI) and Wayne Allard (R-CO)
requested the study from the General Accounting Office to evaluate
oversight of watch list properties by HUD's Office of Multifamily
Housing Assistance Restructuring. The
GAO study assessed 211 properties placed on the watch-list by OMHAR
because the properties had rents reduced under the mark-to-market
program but did not have their mortgages restructured to avoid a
situation where the property did not have sufficient cash flow to
cover debt service and operating costs. Owners
of 177 properties on the list had not gone through mortgage
restructuring despite recommendations from OMHAR, according to the
report. Three properties were ineligible for restructuring because of
owner disqualification, and 31 were not financially viable for
restructuring. Physical
inspections of the properties found that 87 percent garnered satisfactory marks, although 41 percent had not been
re-inspected after being placed on the list, mainly because HUD
guidelines do not require another inspection for three years if the
property is rated satisfactory. Case
studies of six watch-list properties and the GAO report are available
at www.gao.gov/new.items/d02953.pdf
Copyright
2002 Ansel Publications. All rights reserved.
HUD
Notice 02-17 (August 2, 2002)
Renewal of Expiring PRACS Contracts
This notice announces the one-year renewal of expiring Project Rental
Assistance Contracts for properties Under the Section 202 program,
supportive housing for the elderly, and Section 811, supporting housing
for persons with disabilities.
HUD
Notice 02-20 (August 15, 2002)
Area Payment Standard Instructions for Vouchers
This
notice announces how area exception payment standard amounts are
determined and reviewed, reporting instructions for approved area
exceptions, and provides an overview of changes specified in the housing
choice voucher program.
HUD
Notice 02-16 (Aug. 23, 2002)
Prepayment of 202/8 Direct Loans
This notice announces revisions for the prepayment of direct loans
on Section 202 and 202/8 properties with inclusion of FHA mortgage
insurance guidelines.
Federal
Register FR-4679-N-04 (August 30, 2002)
Reduction in MF Mortgage Insurance Premiums
This notice announces the lowering of mortgage insurance premiums
for certain FHA multifamily mortgage insurance programs whose
commitments will be issued in fiscal year 2003, and republished others
at the rate that was in effect in FY2002.
Directive
Number 98-05 (September 3, 2002)
ADA Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities
This notice announces final accessibility guidelines issued by the
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board to be used as
a basis for standards of new construction and alterations of
recreational facilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Federal
Register FR-4672-F-02 (September 4, 2002)
Exception Payments to Offset Utilities
This notice announces the withdrawal of the rule that temporarily
increased FMRs in areas affected by increased utility process and
restores the regulatory language back to its original form.
PIH
Notice 02-19 (September 30, 2002)
Extension of 99-7, Subordinate Financing
This notice announces the reinstatement of HUD Notice 99-07, which
was previously extended in HUD Notice 01-9, and extends it until
September 30, 2003.
PIH
Notice 02-21 (October 2, 2002)
Processing of Vouchers for Relocation
This notice announces the submission and processing of public
housing agency applications for housing choice vouchers for relocation
or replacement housing related to demolition or disposition and plans
for removal of public housing units, and supersedes PIH Notice 2001-20.
Federal
Register FR-4679-N-05 (October 15, 2002)
Reduction of FHA Multifamily Insurance Premiums
This notice re-issues a notice published August 30, 2002, lowering
the mortgage insurance premiums for certain FHA multifamily mortgage
insurance programs.
IRS
Revenue Ruling 2002-65 (October 28, 2002)
Section 236 RAP
This notice announces that Section 236 rental assistance and rent
supplement payments are not considered grants under the low-income
housing tax credit program and will not be subtracted from eligible
basis. The ruling does not apply to Section 236 interest reduction
payments.
PIH Notice 02-22 (October 29, 2002)
Screening & Eviction for Drug Abuse
This notice announces the final rule for screening and eviction for drug
abuse and other criminal activity.
Copyright
2002 Ansel Publications. All rights reserved.
Appropriations
Still Not Settled
Congress has had to pass three continuing resolutions to keep the
government running since the end of the fiscal year and a lame duck
session after the November 5 elections will be required. None
of the thirteen appropriations bills had been passed as of September 30,
and an extension for block grants funds to provide additional monies for
Temporary Assistance to Need Families was incorporated into the
continuing resolutions. Mid-term elections, homeland security, and a
proposed war in Iraq have been blamed for the delay. A budget ceiling
requested by the president has also made it difficult to finalize
numbers for domestic spending bills and the HUD budget has historically
not been as much of a priority as the Veteran's Administration or other
agencies covered by the subcommittee's jurisdiction.
Although
the Senate passed the HUD bill in July, the House appropriations
subcommittee
did not get a look at the bill October. Housing officials have pinned
their hopes on the Senate version with more adequate funding for
affordable housing issues and are lobbying for rescission of a provision
in the House version that will change the way renewal vouchers are
calculated. Funding in the House version did not change between the
subcommittee and full appropriations committee with $16.6 billion
provided for the Section 8 certificate fund; $841 million for Section
202 elderly housing; $259 million for Section 811 disabled housing;
$4.58 billion for the CDBG program; and $5 billion for community
development.
While
the House bill closely follows the administration's budget blueprint,
the Senate is more fully funding housing programs with lead paint
hazards taking the fore. The Senate budgeted $201 million in 2003 for
hazard reduction and $75 million for a new lead paint hazard reduction
demonstration program that focus on the disproportionate risk of lead
poisoning in urban areas with children under six years of age.
Stall
on H.R. 3995 Prompts Democratic Letter
A handful of Democrats have asked the Speaker of the House to bring the
omnibus housing bill to the floor before some provisions are lost to the
untimely delay. Speaker
Dennis Hastert (R-IL) received the letter from 24 Democratic
members of the House Financial Services Committee with the
request to begin floor debate on H.R. 3995, which passed the committee
in early July with bipartisan support. The National Housing Trust Fund
and the re-introduction of the Public Housing Drug Elimination Program
are two of the main issues in the bill, along with other issues that
confront the affordable housing crisis. Speculation
about the delay in bringing the bill to the floor maintains that
Republicans are trying to garner support for the bill's original version
before amendment in committee. The original, as backed by Republicans,
contained the re-authorization of HOPE VI, the Native American Housing
and Self Determination Act of 1996, and Housing for People with AIDS,
homeownership provisions and a housing impact analysis requirement.
Although
the letter states that the Democratic signees prefer a national housing
trust fund over the bill's current program of matching grants to state
and local trust funds, the importance of an affordable housing
production program and the bill's timely passage is critical and should
be up for debate.
Housing
Production Act Not Expected This Session
Because of
the delay in appropriations bills, Senator "Kit" Bond (R-MO)
is not expecting his new housing legislation to make it through this
year, but hopes to bring housing issues more to the forefront with his
"Affordable Housing
Production
Expansion Act of 2002." Bond's
bill is expected to "expand the production of affordable low income
housing for extremely low, very low, and low-income families," with
provisions that would allow for "thrifty production" vouchers,
institute a housing production block grant administered by state housing
finance agencies and provide new loan guarantee authority for public
housing agencies. Production,
rehabilitation rehab of private and federally assisted
rental
housing, moderate and substantial, would be allowed, along with
preservation of at-risk government-assisted housing. Other provisions
include land trusts and the conversion of public and Section 202 elderly
housing into assisted living facilities for the elderly. All new
production
and
rehab projects would be required to be mixed income rental housing.
Funding
for these programs would be $1 billion for 2003 and no funds would be
appropriated from existing programs, especially any unused Section 8
budget, Bond has said. A least thirty percent must be used for extremely
low income households and seventy percent could be used for residents up
to eighty percent of area median income.
Fatal
Errors System Incurs Changes, Postponement
TRACS officials have announced changes, postponements and
corrections of errors in the Fatal Edits portion of the TRACS
system. Officials recently removed two fatal error messages from
the Security Deposit logic and replaced them with discrepancies. Since
both changes are discrepancies and not fatal errors, they will not
reject mat transactions. Fatal error F0221 has been replaced with the
CE252 discrepancy and F0222 was replaced with the discrepancy CE253. The
changes were made in October 8 and officials have since applied the
CE253 discrepancy edit to the Rent Supplement Units and RAP Units.
As a
result, a security deposit
may not be less than $50 for rent supplements or RAPs. Since the $50
requirement was already in place for 202 PRACs, 811 PRACs, and 202 PACs,
these requirements will not change. The
change is in response to revised 4350 handbook requirements on
security deposits and should be in place in November. Details about
security deposits are available on the "TRACS Documents" web
page under "Security Deposit Logic".
In other news, a set of fatal edits for the TRACS system scheduled for
release in December has been postponed indefinitely. TRACS
officials also recently discovered that users were not receiving TRACS
fatal error messages. The error was corrected and as of October 1, users
should again be receiving fatal errors from the TRACS batch process.
Keep Private Information Off Discussion Forum
Officials are currently reviewing the TRACS discussion forum on
the web site for security issues. The forum is available for TRACS
users to discuss problems and questions about the TRACS system. TRACS
officials warn users to remember that sensitive and private information,
including tenant's social security numbers should not be mentioned
during use of forum. The forum is available www.hud.gov/office/hsg/mfh/trx/trxsum.cfm.
Top
|