|
AHMA-NCNH
TOUCHSTONE / Newsletters
|
July, 2002 Newsletter
Copyright 2002 Ansel Publications. All rights
reserved.
Report
Evaluates HUD Goals
Although housing for extremely low-income
families has gotten worse, an increasing homeownership rate and the
improved physical condition of HUD-assisted rental housing are
two indicators that HUD has made progress in meeting its strategic
goals, according to HUD Secretary Mel Martinez. In a report issued recently by HUD officials, the
objectives and outcome indicators for the department's
strategic goals are detailed and explained. The report, A Performance and Accountability Report
for FY2001,
lists the department's
five goals as:
-
to increase the availability of decent, safe
and affordable housing;
-
to
ensure equal opportunity in housing;
-
to
promote self-sufficiency of and asset development by
families and individuals;
-
to
improve community quality of life and economic vitality;
-
to
ensure public trust in HUD.
While
admitting that the supply of HUD-assisted rental housing is inadequate for current needs, HUD officials cite
the cause as loss of affordable housing stock and the lack of sufficient
replacement housing for units lost. Homeownership has been the main
focus of HUDs
mission since Martinez was appointed, with rental housing and
homelessness taking a back seat. In his proposal for the 2003 budget,
the secretary announced that funding would triple for programs assisting
low-income families to become first-time homebuyers. The Self-Help
Opportunity Program could receive up to $65 million, up from $22 million
in the last budget, and a new "American Dream" down payment
assistance program would funnel $200 million into the HOME program to
assist up to 40,000 families a year with down payments, closing costs,
and/or reduction of mortgage interest rates. For 2003, funding for
affordable housing was mentioned in connection with expanding
opportunities for faith-based and community-based programs to assist
low-income families with housing.
Although the department claims credit for the
reduction in worst case housing needs of renters between 1997 and 1999,
goals for increasing housing availability will no longer be measured by
the ratio of assisted households to households with worst case needs.
HUD officials claim that only Congress and the economy can reduce worst
case housing needs. The report is available on HUD's website on the web
page of the Chief Financial Officer.
The final 2003 Annual Performance Plan released by
HUD in April is also available on the HUD web site. Although keeping the
same mission statement, the plan makes interim adjustments to HUD's
six-year strategic plan with eight goals that reflect the
department's
attention to homeownership, faith-based initiatives, homelessness
and improved housing management. The eight goals include:
-
Simplify the home buying process;
-
Help families become homeowners;
-
Improve public and assisted housing and give
residents more choices;
-
Strengthen faith-based and community
partnerships;
-
Effectively address the challenge of
homelessness;
-
Embrace high standards of ethics,
management
and
accountability;
-
Ensure equal opportunity and access to
housing;
-
Support community and economic development.
The first portion of HUD's
overall strategic plan, the 2020 Management Reform Plan, was released
in the summer of 1998. Departmental functions were streamlined into
specialized centers such as the Real Estate Assessment Center and more
department business was handled electronically. The second portion of
the six-year plan was released in 2000, but HUD Secretary Mel Martinez
announced last winter that the department would return to the old
system of regional management.
Section
515 Housing Needs Attention
Approximately 300,000 low-income rural housing
units are in danger of being converted to market rate properties as
the housing shortage continues, and immediate measures must be taken
to ensure housing for the rural poor, according to a report by the
Housing Assistance Council.
The report, A Rural
Rental Housing Preservation and Nonprofit Capacity to Purchase and
Preserve Section 515 Projects, claims that non-metropolitan counties adjacent to metropolitan areas
would benefit greatly from low-income preservation. Although rents are
increasing in these areas, a large number of nonprofit companies are
available to buy and manage rental properties that would otherwise be
lost to market rate units. The report provides several case studies of
buyouts involving Section 515 projects by nonprofit companies that
were prosperous, along with maps of project locations by state,
county-by-county information on projects and markets, and
a county-by-county list of housing nonprofits. The report is available on HAC's web site
www.ruralhome.org
New
Freedom Initiative Boosts Disabled Services
Access to housing services are improving under
HUD's
New Freedom Initiative for persons with disabilities. After the president issued an executive order to
the department to improve disabled services, HUD began a campaign to
improve and implement access to services for people with disabilities.
Initiatives include:
-
revision
of the Section 8 program to allow the use of vouchers for mortgage
payments and purchase of homes for people with disabilities;
-
a
pilot project in eleven states that would allow HUD and the
Department of Health and Human Services to work together to
facilitate the transition of non-elderly persons with
disabilities from nursing homes into community living;
-
technical
assistance to housing authorities that experience difficulty when
using housing vouchers, and preference to housing authorities that
use a specified percentage of vouchers for persons with
disabilities;
HUD Official Serves Short Term;
OMHAR Gets Director;
HUD's
third highest-ranking official has decided to leave the
department after only three months. Robert L. Woodson Jr., who served
as chief of staff, was appointed February 2002. Woodson has not
announced his future plans.
Charles Williams, a consultant from Salt Lake
City, Utah, has begun work as director of the Office of Multifamily Housing
Assistance Restructuring OMHAR. Former director Ira Peppercorn resigned
last winter after serving since October 1998. Barbara Chiapella,
deputy director of operations for the Office of Multifamily Housing
Assistance Restructuring, had been appointed interim acting director.
Report
Requests More Housing from Congress
A recent report concerning the one-strike rule
makes a requests that Congress subsidized more affordable housing units
to ease housing crisis and assist the housing needs of parents after
imprisonment. The challenges of obtaining housing assistance
after leaving the criminal justice system are among the topics and
policy recommendations addressed in a joint report from the Community Legal
Services and the Center on Law and Social Policy. Although problems
with employment, housing and public assistance experienced by former
prison inmates are documented, the report also focuses on the
difficulties caused by HUD's one-strike policy of termination
for housing assistance. The report is available at www.clasp.org
HUD
Notice 2002-20 (May 17, 2002)
Project-Based AAFs
This notice announces updated procedures for annual adjustment or
pre-renewal contract rent for Section 8 projects, describes procedures
for applying statutory comparability requirements and provides guidance
concerning rent comparability studies.
Federal
Register FR-4741-N-01 (May 24, 2002)
FMRs for Mod Rehab
This notice announces revised fair market rents for the Section 8
Housing Choice Voucher Program to reflect estimated 40th and
50th percentile levels trended to April 1, 2003.
HUD Notice
2002-08 (May 6, 2002)
Reinstatement of QHWRA
This notice announces the reinstatement and extension until May 31,
2003, of HUD Notice 2000-18, Admission and Occupancy Provisions of the
Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 for Multifamily
Housing Programs, issued September 7, 2000.
HUD Notice
2002-09 (May 10, 2002)
Corrections to Section 236
Guidelines
This notice announces technical corrections and clarifications to HUD
Notice 2001-07, guidelines for Calculating and Retaining Section 236
Excess Income, published July 27, 2001.
HUD Notice
2002-11 (May 29, 2002)
Reinstatement of Section 235
Recapture
This notice announces the reinstatement and extension of HUD Notice
1994-66, Recapture of Section 235 Assistance Guide, issued September 2,
1994.
HUD Notice
2002-14 (June 7, 2002)
Procedures for Reduction of
Baseline Units
This notice announces procedures for voluntary reduction of housing
choice voucher baseline units which have not been leased up and utilized
in the public housing agency jurisdiction.
HUD Notice
2002-15 (June 7, 2002)
Reinstatement of Discrimination
in the Voucher Program
This notice announces the reinstatement of HUD Notice 2001-02,
Prohibition of Discrimination against Families with Housing Choice
Vouchers by Owners of Low-Income Tax Credit and HOME Developments.,
issued January 31, 2002.
Omnibus
Housing Bill To Undergo Major Alteration
Efforts by housing advocates and Congress have been responsible for
several changes in the omnibus housing bull since its introduction
last March and more changes are on the way. Housing and
Community Opportunity Subcommittee Chair Marge Roukema (R-NJ),
who introduced H.R. 3995, will be making a manager's amendment to the
bill at the subcommittee hearing and other subcommittee members are
expected to proposed their own changes.
Amendments to be included by Roukema are:
-
Recaptured Section 8 funds would not be used
for the affordable rental housing production program for very low
and extremely low income people under HOME and funding for the
program would be authorized.
-
The administration's request for a down payment
assistance initiative would be met by incorporating
H.R. 4446.
-
Risk-based capital levels for the
Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund would be deleted.
-
C
H.R. 4817, the Elderly Housing Quality Improvement Act of 2002,
would be incorporated instead of the modernization demonstration
for Section 236 elderly properties.
-
A demonstration program with 5,000
incremental vouchers for extremely low income people in new or
substantially rehabilitated properties would be substituted for
"thrifty production vouchers" for units produced with
full capital subsidies for extremely low income.
-
Authorization for a change of rent levels for
new voucher tenants from forty percent of adjusted income to forty
percent of gross income.
-
Public housing agencies would use two percent
of their funds on efforts that help families find places to use
their vouchers instead of the proposed five percent.
-
The addition of a provision to allow voucher
holders to move into units prior to PHA inspection in certain
circumstances.
-
The prohibition of the waiver of PHAs'
resident commissioner requirement.
-
Suspension of plans for small public housing
agencies that would provide for tenant participation.
-
Discarding language from the administration's
request to privately finance public housing rehabilitation with
the conversion of public housing to project-based vouchers
and also the provisions for religious organizations engaging in
housing development.
-
Incorporation of the National Housing Trust
Fund bill. Proposed changes from other subcommittee
members include:
-
An expansion of the use of enhanced
vouchers in cases where the property is changing use.
-
An amendment concerning ways to end
homelessness.
-
Authorization
for increased housing assistance for victims of domestic
violence.
-
An
amendment on Section 3, the federal law that requires
agencies receiving federal housing and community development
funds to employ and contract with low income people.
-
Predatory
lending legislation.
-
Protection for innocent tenants of the
"one-strike" provision that would allow
eviction only if they knew or should have known about the
criminal activity, along with an eviction exemption for
victims of crime.
A major
amendment including the National Affordable Housing Trust Fund Act of
2002 is expected to be offered by Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who
sponsored the fund in H.R. 2349. The national trust fund has garnered
176 cosponsors in the House and 2,650 sponsoring organizations from the
housing industry and other advocacy groups. Changes to the fund
that would be included in the omnibus bill but are absent from the trust
fund bill include:
-
The
Davis-Bacon Act would apply to properties developed with the
funds;
-
Funds
would be available to local and state governments with a split of
sixty percent of funds to localities and forty percent to states
with the small state minimum of one percent preserved;
-
rehabilitation
that is not substantial will also qualify for funding;
-
Cooperatives
will be eligible for funding.
H.R. 2349 and the proposed changes are expected to
be offered first, with an alternative
trust fund amendment less the provisions that do not identify the FHA
and Ginnie Mae surpluses as the main source of funding and uses
appropriations when necessary beyond 2003. A final amendment would
provide matching funds from federal sources for state and local trust
funds, with the matching funds subject to the same income targeting.
Housing
Issues Are Crux Point for Economy
Good, safe, affordable housing is the underpinning of all other
domestic concerns affecting economics, social policy and community
life, according to a report of the Millennial Housing Commission.
Commission co-chairmen Susan Molinari and Richard Ravitch expressed
their hope that Congress take a serious look at the commission's
report over the next few years because of housing's
enormous impact on economic well-being. The report, Meeting Our Nation's Housing Challenges, is a result of a 17-month
study into the housing industry. Recommendations for improving
government housing regulations are listed in four areas: strengthening
communities; devolving decision-making; involving the private sector,
and ensuring sustainability. Budgetary needs were not addressed in the
report.
Because the commission did not reach a unified
overall consensus, the report lists 13 primary and 15 secondary
recommendations for reforms to assist low-income families and what
used to be considered middle income, according to Molinari, that are
currently caught up in the housing crisis.
The report requests that the government spend
more money on capital subsidies for very low-income families; waive
rent levels to keep them thirty percent of income; provide exit tax
relief legislation to preserve existing affordable housing; expand the
ability of states to issue tax-exempt debt to reduce occupancy costs;
a homeownership tax credit; and a multifamily rental production
program to attract private capital. Although the report also
recommended ways to improve the housing voucher program, it should not
be the main source of housing subsidies.
A major reform of public housing involving a
project-based, privatized system is proposed in the report, along with
requests for new public housing properties for the very poor and a
transfer of subsidies to the housing certificate fund. Because
preservation of housing units as contracts expire is another serious
housing concern, a production program with a one-time, 100 percent
capital grant to assist very low-income families is outlined in the
report. Although the commission briefly discussed the issue of how
vouchers are issued annually, many families remain in affordable
housing for years. A solution was not fully addressed in the
report because of the enormity of the issue, according to
Molinari. However, expansion and/or improvement of the housing
choice voucher, HOME program, and low income housing tax credit were
mentioned.
Ravitch said there are few new ideas in housing
and much of that is under development in just combinations and
permutations of old ideas. In his 40 years in housing, he said he has
seen much work left undone in housing despite the United States
providing more housing as a society than anywhere else in the world.
Despite the production of 5.5 million units nationwide over the past
four years, there is a growing affordability problem and 14 million
families pay more than 50 percent of their income on housing, Ravitch
said. Although Ravitch acknowledged that governmental rules and
regulations sometimes increase the cost of affordable housing, they
are necessary in a democracy to protect the rights of some groups of
people.
According to Ravitch, housing is twenty percent of
the national wealth, the biggest expenditure an American family incurs,
and has such an enormous impact on family stability, housing is often
overlooked by politicians for three reasons: a large portion of the
country is well housed; housing is a complex issue that necessarily
involves discussion of more controversial issues; and a significant
change in housing policy would most likely come with a big price tag.
Commissioner Cushing Dolbeare said she felt several
more pages could be included in the report, such as suggestions to
include information on civil rights and specific endorsement of the
National Housing Trust Fund.
Commissioner Bart Harvey, CEO of the Enterprise
Foundation, said that the recommendations was meant to be used on the
federal level, but were equally applicable on the state and local level
as well, although the commission's
report does not have any authority over the actions of these
governments.
The lone dissenting opinion came from Robert
Rector, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation. Rector said
that he disagreed reluctantly with the final report because it ignored
the underlying causes of high housing costs and focused more on the
superficial symptoms, such as insufficient hours worked by the head of
household for poor families; erosion of the sanctity of marriage; and
government regulations that lead to increased housing costs. The way to
deal with high housing costs is through an increased wage, Rector said.
He also cited faulty data that could lead to improper conclusions and
policies.
In response, Molinari said the commission
recommended removing regulations penalizing married couples, but did not
want to encourage women in abusive relationships to remain just to
retain housing.
Several members of the twenty-member commission
said that they did not participate in partisan sniping and were proud
that the group was able to obtain a useful consensus between so many
members.
The bipartisan commission was authorized by the
Congressional 2000 HUD budget in an effort to find ways to expand
affordable housing needs for low-income families. Commission members
were appointed by members of the appropriations and banking committees
of both houses and from the appropriate subcommittees. Members include
representatives from various state housing and finance agencies; real
estate and development; Harvard University; the banking community;
several foundations and the affordable housing industry.
top
|